SAP Accounting Consulting

‘Installed at’ Jurisdiction Code not passed to Accounting

October 23, 2009 at 8:44 pm

[at'] [billing] [code] [CRM] [installed] [jurisdiction] [Leasing] [MAP_TTE_TO_TAXITEM] [SAPLBILL_ACC_IF] [Ship] [Tax] [to]

Tax event, tax code changes to FranceSymptom Tax code description for the tax code 500 to...
Empty P45 datasetsSymptom It was possible to create empty datasets for P45...
Disabling of Taxes in CRM using External Tax PackageSymptom The business scenario is like this :- Customer has...
SAP BP: Search Business Partners by Tax DetailsSymptom A new search help is provided which helps to...
No tax transaction key exists for billing documentSymptom No tax transaction key exists for billing document and...

Symptom

For example for Leasing, the ‘installed at’ tax jurisdiction code overrides the ’ship to’ tax jurisdiction code for calculating taxes in CRM (-> also see note 816609).
But when the CRM billing document is transferred to accounting in ERP, the ’ship to’ tax jurisdiction code is passed to accounting in ERP instead of the ‘installed at’ tax jurisdiction code even though the ‘installed at’ tax jurisdiction code was used for calculating taxes in CRM.

Other terms

CRM, billing, Leasing, ‘installed at’ tax jurisdiction code, ’ship to’ tax jurisdiction code, MAP_TTE_TO_TAXITEM, SAPLBILL_ACC_IF

Reason and Prerequisites

The ‘installed at’ tax jurisdiction code was so far not considered when the CRM billing document is transferred to accounting; instead always only the ’ship to’ tax jurisdiction code was considered.

Solution

Please implement the attached correction instruction in your system.