October 22, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Symptom
Even though a Business Partner does not have any standard address usages assigned, addresses are displayed in the standard address usage tab. As a result, the error R11 244 is thrown.
Other terms
BUT021_FS, BUT020, Business Partner address usages, BUA_BUPA_EVENT_ISDAT, XXDEFAULT_CHECK, LBUA0F03, R11 244, “Error for validity periods of addresses”
Reason and Prerequisites
When a Business Partner [...]
July 23, 2009 at 12:03 am
Symptom
There are inconsistent partners that have address references in ADRC, ADCP or ADRV but the corresponding BUT020 entries do not exist.
Other terms
BUT020 ADRC ADRV ADCP REPORT ADDRESS INCONSISTENCY
Reason and Prerequisites
Database Inconsistency
Solution
Create and run the attached Z_BUT020_GENERATE report as a local object in your system through transaction SE38.
There is a parameter testrun in the [...]
July 3, 2009 at 12:39 am
Symptom
This note tries to answer questions on the SAP business partner that may have come-up on an upgrade to SAP_ABA 5.0A and higher releases:
1. Is table BUT001 obsolete?
The table BUT001 is obsolete from SAP_ABA release 5.0A and higher. It is now possible to maintain multiple identification and industry sector information for a [...]
July 2, 2009 at 4:56 am
Symptom
1)Duplicate address guid in but020.
2) Same address guid refers to two different addresses in but020 and bptime_but020
Other terms
bupa_conv_ei2bapi bupa_address_upd_consistent bupa_address_add bupa_create_from_data but020 address guid
Reason and Prerequisites
Address guid in but020 and bptime_but020 should refer to the same address. But no such check is done to ensure this.
Solution
Please apply the corrections of the note